Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Alec Bohm

Alec Bohm

3B·PHI
Compare
Compare
PA
612
H
153
HR
20
AVG
.274
xwOBA
.344
PPG
2.52
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202663252.223.285.354.131.29713.9%7.1%6.8%711151.83—
2025128504.287
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
59
.344
xBA
87
.286
xSLG
.335
.409
.122
.325
16.3%
5.8%
10.5%
11
2
274
2.14
—
2024152607.279.334.447.168.34714.2%6.6%7.6%1553812.51—
2023164612.274.330.436.162.34415.4%6.9%8.5%2044132.52—
2022182634.278.319.396.118.33517.4%4.9%12.5%1323511.93—
2021121417.247.308.342.095.31326.6%7.4%19.2%741561.29—
202047180.338.404.481.143.35720.0%8.9%11.1%411082.30—
59
.456
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
44
89.4
Median EV
46
92.0
90th % EV
42
104.8
Barrel %
17
5.7
Hard-Hit %
48
41.7
Sweet-Spot %
54
36.8
Bat Speed
Avg
55
70.7
Median
42
71.3
90th %
58
77.1
Plate Discipline
Chase %
33
30.2
Whiff %
88
15.9
K %
84
15.4
BB %
29
6.9
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
96
≈ 34th pctl
Chase cost
-44.6r
464 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-22.9r
359 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
49.9%
2,507 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.69
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
42+25%12+8%13+14%752+10%10-6%16+19%37+26%35+52%31+64%115+41%22-16%51-24%55-24%63+0%32+59%17+55%11+33%33+12%41-31%74-26%62-9%34+47%17+67%9+48%21+45%29+3%40-11%18+22%2745+25%8+7%15+17%6+13%8413CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000