Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Alec Bohm

Alec Bohm

3B·PHI
Compare
Compare
PA
607
H
155
HR
15
AVG
.279
xwOBA
.347
PPG
2.51
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202665264.220.280.357.137.29314.0%6.8%7.2%811241.91—
2025128504.287
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
71
.347
xBA
91
.286
xSLG
.335
.409
.122
.325
16.3%
5.8%
10.5%
11
2
274
2.14
—
2024152607.279.334.447.168.34714.2%6.6%7.6%1553812.51—
2023164612.274.330.436.162.34415.4%6.9%8.5%2044132.52—
2022182634.278.319.396.118.33517.4%4.9%12.5%1323511.93—
2021121417.247.308.342.095.31326.6%7.4%19.2%741561.29—
202047180.338.404.481.143.35720.0%8.9%11.1%411082.30—
59
.456
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
65
90.4
Median EV
70
93.8
90th % EV
39
104.2
Barrel %
28
6.8
Hard-Hit %
67
45.6
Sweet-Spot %
67
36.9
Bat Speed
Avg
62
71.0
Median
56
71.8
90th %
44
76.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
51
27.2
Whiff %
85
15.3
K %
91
14.2
BB %
19
6.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
104
≈ 64th pctl
Chase cost
-33.7r
368 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-18.4r
289 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
50.1%
2,158 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.41
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
135+0%7+29%7233+0%15+16%25+17%23+27%26+33%12+14%7+35%17-26%39-22%59-20%50-18%56+63%27+50%8+19%26+17%48-33%66-24%62-12%48+29%17+0%9+35%23+48%29+9%45+30%54+21%24+30%10+0%10+38%8+18%11+33%12+13%8+0%821CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000