Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Andrés Giménez

Andrés Giménez

2B / SS·TOR
Compare
Compare
PA
616
H
140
HR
15
AVG
.251
xwOBA
.300
PPG
2.12
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202664231.223.268.358.135.26119.0%3.5%15.5%67971.52—
2025119370.209
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
7
.300
xBA
19
.240
xSLG
.287
.312
.103
.308
17.8%
6.8%
11.0%
7
14
208
1.75
—
2024166634.252.301.339.087.30215.3%4.1%11.2%9343261.96—
2023158616.251.315.399.148.30018.2%5.2%13.0%15303352.12—
2022162557.297.373.466.169.33420.1%6.1%14.0%17253532.18—
202170210.218.286.351.133.27325.7%5.2%20.5%511801.14—
202042132.263.336.398.135.30221.2%5.3%15.9%37731.74—
8
.370
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
1
83.1
Median EV
1
87.0
90th % EV
13
102.3
Barrel %
16
5.5
Hard-Hit %
3
27.0
Sweet-Spot %
3
30.3
Bat Speed
Avg
12
67.0
Median
14
68.5
90th %
14
73.8
Plate Discipline
Chase %
4
39.7
Whiff %
41
23.0
K %
64
18.2
BB %
6
5.2
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
87
≈ 10th pctl
Chase cost
-58.1r
575 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-12.6r
273 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
54.3%
2,346 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.01
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
+42%12+57%7+55%11+22%9+17%12+0%83+55%20+45%31+34%44+40%45+32%22+23%13+22%9+50%28-6%47-27%63-21%67-25%44+57%40+13%8+57%28+13%47-14%49-25%36-18%44+60%20+25%8+27%11+36%22+24%25+47%15+67%2131252211CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000