Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Andrés Giménez

Andrés Giménez

2B / SS·TOR
Compare
Compare
PA
634
H
147
HR
9
AVG
.252
xwOBA
.302
PPG
1.96
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202666240.221.270.351.130.26119.2%3.3%15.9%671001.52—
2025119370.209
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
9
.302
xBA
60
.257
xSLG
.287
.312
.103
.308
17.8%
6.8%
11.0%
7
14
208
1.75
—
2024166634.252.301.339.087.30215.3%4.1%11.2%9343261.96—
2023158616.251.315.399.148.30018.2%5.2%13.0%15303352.12—
2022162557.297.373.466.169.33420.1%6.1%14.0%17253532.18—
202170210.218.286.351.133.27325.7%5.2%20.5%511801.14—
202042132.263.336.398.135.30221.2%5.3%15.9%37731.74—
7
.362
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
5
85.4
Median EV
4
88.3
90th % EV
8
101.0
Barrel %
5
2.8
Hard-Hit %
5
28.5
Sweet-Spot %
33
34.5
Bat Speed
Avg
9
66.6
Median
6
67.7
90th %
13
73.8
Plate Discipline
Chase %
6
36.7
Whiff %
57
20.9
K %
84
15.3
BB %
4
4.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
103
≈ 63th pctl
Chase cost
-47.2r
530 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-10.8r
251 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
56.0%
2,393 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.42
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
5+0%10+38%8+27%11+0%73+57%14+63%19+26%38+42%43+27%30+29%21+0%8+39%33+2%46-22%59-18%66-15%67+65%23+0%8+46%26+7%43-17%66-19%64-9%43+77%22+27%11+75%8+17%23+20%25+21%24+45%113+13%83545221CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000