Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Andrés Giménez

Andrés Giménez

2B / SS·TOR
Compare
Compare
PA
370
H
69
HR
7
AVG
.209
xwOBA
.308
PPG
1.75
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202664231.223.268.358.135.26119.0%3.5%15.5%67971.52—
2025119370.209
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

370 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
17
.308
xBA
36
.245
.287
.312
.103
.308
17.8%
6.8%
11.0%
7
14
208
1.75
—
2024166634.252.301.339.087.30215.3%4.1%11.2%9343261.96—
2023158616.251.315.399.148.30018.2%5.2%13.0%15303352.12—
2022162557.297.373.466.169.33420.1%6.1%14.0%17253532.18—
202170210.218.286.351.133.27325.7%5.2%20.5%511801.14—
202042132.263.336.398.135.30221.2%5.3%15.9%37731.74—
xSLG
4
.357
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
5
85.6
Median EV
6
89.1
90th % EV
5
100.8
Barrel %
5
3.0
Hard-Hit %
4
27.7
Sweet-Spot %
18
33.7
Bat Speed
Avg
16
67.8
Median
12
69.0
90th %
16
74.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
14
34.6
Whiff %
69
19.8
K %
70
17.8
BB %
27
6.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
94
≈ 27th pctl
Chase cost
-31.3r
311 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-9.7r
213 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
51.8%
1,492 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.75
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
3+44%16+13%8+43%7+33%6+0%8+0%6+44%9+62%29+36%33+27%44+49%37+44%16+7%14+50%18+10%50-8%72-30%66-7%59+71%21+11%9+47%32-13%47-33%51-34%71-25%48+58%26+14%7+8%13+26%19-8%13+21%28+50%12534+0%94241CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000