Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. SS peers

Rank #22 of 64

Each bar is one SS, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-200-1000+100Andrés Giménez
Andrés Giménez · #22
V⁻ -21VORP 1V⁺ 43
Andrés Giménez

Andrés Giménez

2B / SS·TOR
Compare
Compare
PA
240
H
49
HR
6
AVG
.221
xwOBA
.261
PPG
1.52
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj90387.246.303.366.121.30117.4%5.5%11.9%8141852.05—
202666240.221
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
1
.261
xBA
10
.219
xSLG
.270
.351
.130
.261
19.2%
3.3%
15.9%
6
7
100
1.52
—
2025119370.209.287.312.103.30817.8%6.8%11.0%7142081.75—
2024166634.252.301.339.087.30215.3%4.1%11.2%9343261.96—
2023158616.251.315.399.148.30018.2%5.2%13.0%15303352.12—
2022162557.297.373.466.169.33420.1%6.1%14.0%17253532.18—
202170210.218.286.351.133.27325.7%5.2%20.5%511801.14—
202042132.263.336.398.135.30221.2%5.3%15.9%37731.74—
1
.304
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
4
85.1
Median EV
15
89.2
90th % EV
14
101.6
Barrel %
9
3.4
Hard-Hit %
2
23.6
Sweet-Spot %
2
27.5
Bat Speed
Avg
5
65.9
Median
3
65.9
90th %
9
72.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
4
42.6
Whiff %
44
22.2
K %
59
19.2
BB %
3
3.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
101
≈ 52th pctl
Chase cost
-5.5r
67 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.2r
39 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
55.1%
305 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.51
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
122222+17%6+30%10+11%9432+57%7+25%8-32%25-13%15-13%15+27%111+83%6-11%18-20%15-13%23-22%18+86%74+33%6+14%7+46%13+50%8+57%7+0%6231321CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 305