Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Anthony Santander

Anthony Santander

OF·TOR
Compare
Compare
PA
665
H
140
HR
44
AVG
.235
xwOBA
.330
PPG
2.78
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202562221.175.273.294.119.26827.6%11.3%16.3%60691.11—
2024162665.235
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
43
.330
xBA
8
.227
xSLG
.311
.506
.271
.330
19.4%
8.7%
10.7%
44
2
451
2.78
—
2023161656.257.327.472.215.32023.2%8.4%14.8%2853912.43—
2022161648.240.320.454.214.35818.8%8.5%10.3%3303862.40—
2021113438.241.289.433.192.32923.1%5.3%17.8%1812111.87—
202039165.261.315.575.314.36615.2%6.1%9.1%1101343.44—
201993406.260.299.475.215.32121.2%4.7%16.5%2012222.39—
201835108.198.250.297.099.26619.4%5.6%13.8%11371.06—
20171331.267.267.367.100.24525.8%0.0%25.8%0060.46—
64
.461
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
55
89.8
Median EV
37
91.8
90th % EV
53
105.2
Barrel %
70
11.7
Hard-Hit %
48
41.6
Sweet-Spot %
56
36.3
Bat Speed
Avg
70
71.8
Median
65
72.7
90th %
73
78.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
13
34.0
Whiff %
77
17.8
K %
59
19.4
BB %
52
8.7
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
79
≈ 2th pctl
Chase cost
-68.9r
596 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-18.7r
338 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
49.8%
2,743 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.19
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
5+17%6+27%11+27%1552+0%11+33%15+33%21+29%28+23%39+17%24+45%11+8%13+45%20+15%40-34%58-27%64-3%40+40%47+44%16+39%28+10%31-37%41-19%54-16%56+62%26+33%9+50%12+60%25+9%35+9%32+15%13+27%11545+38%84+0%72CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000