Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. SS peers

Rank #29 of 64

Each bar is one SS, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-200-1000+100Brayan Rocchio
Brayan Rocchio · #29
V⁻ -38VORP -2V⁺ 14
Brayan Rocchio

Brayan Rocchio

2B / SS·CLE
Compare
Compare
PA
244
H
60
HR
5
AVG
.283
xwOBA
.322
PPG
2.33
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj85366.243.312.361.118.30417.1%8.0%9.1%6101722.03—
202666244.283
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
36
.322
xBA
51
.257
xSLG
.367
.406
.123
.322
11.9%
8.6%
3.3%
5
11
154
2.33
—
2025118385.231.293.338.107.29520.0%5.7%14.3%591711.45—
2024145442.206.301.316.110.28120.4%10.0%10.4%8102011.39—
20232386.247.282.321.074.21531.4%4.7%26.7%00200.87—
16
.368
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
8
85.5
Median EV
33
91.5
90th % EV
35
103.8
Barrel %
9
3.2
Hard-Hit %
14
32.8
Sweet-Spot %
26
33.3
Bat Speed
Avg
30
68.8
Median
22
69.5
90th %
21
74.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
33
32.1
Whiff %
48
21.1
K %
92
11.9
BB %
38
8.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
111
≈ 87th pctl
Chase cost
-5.1r
53 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.0r
42 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
46.2%
346 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.06
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
24512+67%65+29%14+10%10+18%11+33%64+50%6+0%13-36%22-18%28-5%21+0%63+63%16+17%18-20%20-37%19-29%1423+14%7+33%12+13%8+8%125142221CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 346