Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Brent Rooker

Brent Rooker

OF·ATH
Compare
Compare
PA
615
H
160
HR
39
AVG
.293
xwOBA
.386
PPG
2.74
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202648203.200.284.389.189.31632.0%9.4%22.6%102771.60—
2025166699.262
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
92
.386
xBA
69
.262
xSLG
.336
.479
.217
.354
22.2%
9.3%
12.9%
30
6
426
2.57
—
2024148615.293.367.561.268.38628.8%9.6%19.2%39114062.74—
2023144526.246.331.488.242.34332.7%9.3%23.4%3042491.73—
20222236.125.222.156.031.26130.6%8.3%22.3%0150.23—
202166214.200.290.395.195.33932.7%7.0%25.7%90590.89—
2020721.316.381.579.263.39323.8%0.0%23.8%10172.43—
93
.561
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
83
91.9
Median EV
86
94.9
90th % EV
87
108.5
Barrel %
97
16.6
Hard-Hit %
88
49.6
Sweet-Spot %
84
39.7
Bat Speed
Avg
70
71.8
Median
75
73.3
90th %
75
78.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
27
30.9
Whiff %
3
31.8
K %
4
28.8
BB %
62
9.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
85
≈ 6th pctl
Chase cost
-55.1r
480 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-17.1r
256 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
50.1%
2,396 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.02
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
135+0%62+33%6+63%16+37%19+12%17+42%24+50%18+17%6+44%16-4%25-27%51-13%39-18%34+48%23+7%14+38%32+17%47-24%71-23%62-16%51+26%34+21%14+46%26+48%46+31%42+10%48+19%26+36%112+6%17+20%15+17%12+11%93+17%6CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000