Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Brent Rooker

Brent Rooker

OF·ATH
Compare
Compare
PA
699
H
164
HR
30
AVG
.262
xwOBA
.354
PPG
2.57
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202648203.200.284.389.189.31632.0%9.4%22.6%102771.60—
2025166699.262
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
73
.354
xBA
63
.262
xSLG
.336
.479
.217
.354
22.2%
9.3%
12.9%
30
6
426
2.57
—
2024148615.293.367.561.268.38628.8%9.6%19.2%39114062.74—
2023144526.246.331.488.242.34332.7%9.3%23.4%3042491.73—
20222236.125.222.156.031.26130.6%8.3%22.3%0150.23—
202166214.200.290.395.195.33932.7%7.0%25.7%90590.89—
2020721.316.381.579.263.39323.8%0.0%23.8%10172.43—
80
.490
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
61
90.7
Median EV
51
93.3
90th % EV
53
105.8
Barrel %
79
13.7
Hard-Hit %
50
44.8
Sweet-Spot %
91
40.6
Bat Speed
Avg
61
71.3
Median
68
73.2
90th %
66
78.1
Plate Discipline
Chase %
53
26.5
Whiff %
15
28.4
K %
41
22.2
BB %
57
9.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
104
≈ 64th pctl
Chase cost
-44.7r
425 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-17.0r
252 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
50.0%
2,576 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.40
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
2+33%6+0%6+0%643+14%7+21%19+26%19+21%19+46%24+25%16+10%10+45%20+17%35-29%55-9%53-10%48+36%22+0%13+36%25+5%42-16%86-32%56-16%43+50%14+10%10+36%25+35%37+3%37+22%45+29%24+0%11+0%7+0%9+7%15+33%12+8%12+0%645CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000