Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. 2B peers

Rank #7 of 45

Each bar is one 2B, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-200-1000+100Brice Turang
Brice Turang · #7
V⁻ -30VORP 17V⁺ 29
Brice Turang

Brice Turang

2B·MIL
Compare
Compare
PA
281
H
63
HR
10
AVG
.274
xwOBA
.380
PPG
3.15
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj101435.258.338.397.139.33121.2%10.8%10.3%11192242.22—
202662281.274
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
85
.380
xBA
55
.261
xSLG
.397
.478
.204
.380
23.1%
16.7%
6.4%
10
11
195
3.15
—
2025165659.288.362.435.147.33722.8%10.0%12.8%18243782.29—
2024160619.254.318.349.095.30317.0%8.1%8.9%7543452.16—
2023135449.217.286.299.082.27620.9%8.5%12.4%6251701.26—
69
.464
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
63
90.3
Median EV
88
96.6
90th % EV
60
106.1
Barrel %
44
8.4
Hard-Hit %
77
47.6
Sweet-Spot %
66
38.0
Bat Speed
Avg
17
68.0
Median
32
70.4
90th %
36
75.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
93
21.0
Whiff %
72
17.8
K %
30
23.1
BB %
96
16.7
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
101
≈ 56th pctl
Chase cost
-5.3r
42 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-3.8r
65 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
38.2%
372 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.47
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
1254+0%7+8%12-8%13+14%14+7%1422+8%12-6%18-40%20-30%27-16%19+30%101+29%7-5%22-50%22-34%32-24%1744+14%7+10%10+11%9+23%13+13%821122CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 372