Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Cedric Mullins

Cedric Mullins

OF·TBR
Compare
Compare
PA
498
H
94
HR
17
AVG
.216
xwOBA
.285
PPG
1.82
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202656220.184.276.295.111.26217.7%9.1%8.6%510921.64—
2025133498.216
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

498 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
1
.285
xBA
0
.207
.303
.391
.175
.285
24.1%
10.0%
14.1%
17
22
242
1.82
—
2024143499.234.306.405.171.29819.6%8.2%11.4%18302862.00—
2023119456.232.307.415.183.29222.1%9.4%12.7%15192642.22—
2022163672.258.321.403.145.29518.8%7.0%11.8%16353702.27—
2021164675.291.362.518.227.34518.5%8.7%9.8%30324422.70—
202042154.270.313.404.134.25024.0%5.2%18.8%37661.57—
20192574.094.183.156.062.23018.9%5.4%13.5%01281.12—
201847191.235.312.359.124.27619.4%8.9%10.5%42761.62—
xSLG
2
.341
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
8
86.4
Median EV
15
90.3
90th % EV
15
102.6
Barrel %
17
6.2
Hard-Hit %
16
35.8
Sweet-Spot %
27
34.6
Bat Speed
Avg
31
69.2
Median
31
70.7
90th %
24
75.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
55
26.3
Whiff %
61
20.9
K %
30
24.1
BB %
69
10.0
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
100
≈ 51th pctl
Chase cost
-37.9r
341 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-14.8r
258 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
47.8%
2,090 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.52
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
54+11%9+0%7-11%9+0%82+9%11+30%20+25%36+9%35+33%36+10%21+10%10+67%18+11%45-22%51-14%76-15%54+24%33+0%9+59%22-8%39-29%52-26%62-27%48+30%30+14%14+8%12+35%20+19%26+17%36+33%24+18%17524+14%74233CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000