Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. C peers

Rank #31 of 66

Each bar is one C, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-300-200-1000+100Edgar Quero
Edgar Quero · #31
V⁻ -22VORP -251V⁺ 2
Edgar Quero

Edgar Quero

C·CHW
Compare
Compare
PA
152
H
24
HR
2
AVG
.185
xwOBA
.252
PPG
0.76
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj47189.242.318.350.108.30419.7%9.0%10.7%41791.68—
202646152.185
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

152 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.252
xBA
2
.196
.269
.238
.053
.252
25.7%
7.9%
17.8%
2
1
35
0.76
—
2025111403.268.334.356.088.29017.6%7.9%9.7%501621.46—
xSLG
0
.270
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
37
89.0
Median EV
36
91.6
90th % EV
13
101.1
Barrel %
3
2.0
Hard-Hit %
14
32.7
Sweet-Spot %
6
28.6
Bat Speed
Avg
11
67.1
Median
5
67.0
90th %
8
71.9
Plate Discipline
Chase %
55
27.7
Whiff %
48
21.6
K %
20
25.7
BB %
30
7.9
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
108
≈ 80th pctl
Chase cost
-4.0r
44 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-1.9r
37 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.1%
268 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.18
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
435152-12%8-30%10+38%8533+0%11-37%19-14%14+0%17+86%72+75%8+30%10-39%18-35%17-7%14514+38%8+30%10413213311CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 268