Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Edmundo Sosa

Edmundo Sosa

2B / 3B·PHI
Compare
Compare
PA
300
H
70
HR
10
AVG
.251
xwOBA
.291
PPG
1.39
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202637106.204.243.337.133.33423.6%2.8%20.8%32431.16—
202590261.276
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

300 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
4
.291
xBA
16
.234
.310
.469
.193
.292
21.5%
3.8%
17.7%
11
1
147
1.63
—
202493275.256.314.420.164.30924.0%4.7%19.3%771431.54—
202395300.251.294.427.176.29124.7%2.7%22.0%1051321.39—
202277190.227.277.369.142.28726.3%2.6%23.7%23911.18—
2021117327.270.347.388.118.32319.3%5.2%14.1%641611.38—
2019810.250.400.250.000.40020.0%10.0%10.0%0020.25—
201833.000.333.000.000.23633.3%33.3%0.0%0010.33—
xSLG
16
.391
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
9
86.5
Median EV
5
88.4
90th % EV
42
104.8
Barrel %
28
6.7
Hard-Hit %
10
32.2
Sweet-Spot %
28
34.1
Bat Speed
Avg
71
71.7
Median
67
72.7
90th %
65
77.4
Plate Discipline
Chase %
2
42.5
Whiff %
28
25.5
K %
21
24.7
BB %
0
2.7
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
91
≈ 17th pctl
Chase cost
-28.0r
281 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-6.1r
135 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
58.8%
1,185 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.88
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
23+20%10+0%841+17%6+50%26+15%27+33%33+35%1755+50%12-11%46-17%63-12%56-7%43+54%28+57%7+82%28+9%44-18%79-21%76-10%48+45%29+8%12+48%21+58%26+31%32-5%21+58%19+57%72+22%9+31%13+54%13+50%6+33%94CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000