Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Edmundo Sosa

Edmundo Sosa

2B / 3B·PHI
Compare
Compare
PA
275
H
64
HR
7
AVG
.256
xwOBA
.309
PPG
1.54
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202637107.202.240.333.131.33223.4%2.8%20.6%32431.16—
202590261.276
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

275 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
14
.309
xBA
16
.234
.310
.469
.193
.292
21.5%
3.8%
17.7%
11
1
147
1.63
—
202493275.256.314.420.164.30924.0%4.7%19.3%771431.54—
202395300.251.294.427.176.29124.7%2.7%22.0%1051321.39—
202277190.227.277.369.142.28726.3%2.6%23.7%23911.18—
2021117327.270.347.388.118.32319.3%5.2%14.1%641611.38—
2019810.250.400.250.000.40020.0%10.0%10.0%0020.25—
201833.000.333.000.000.23633.3%33.3%0.0%0010.33—
xSLG
20
.392
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
33
88.5
Median EV
35
91.6
90th % EV
53
105.2
Barrel %
48
8.6
Hard-Hit %
47
41.4
Sweet-Spot %
3
29.6
Bat Speed
Avg
69
71.5
Median
65
72.6
90th %
68
77.9
Plate Discipline
Chase %
3
40.5
Whiff %
8
30.0
K %
35
24.0
BB %
5
4.7
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
79
≈ 2th pctl
Chase cost
-28.8r
284 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-6.0r
113 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
56.9%
1,090 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.20
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
54+17%64531+15%13+30%10+12%17+33%24+29%17+17%124+69%13+23%31-17%41-22%64-30%47+22%23+19%16+55%22+21%48-17%58-26%70+0%32+54%24+15%13+48%31+50%34+40%45+21%38+19%21+55%20+71%7+40%15+50%20+33%18+50%14+22%952CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000