Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Garrett Cooper

Garrett Cooper

1B·FA
Compare
Compare
PA
457
H
106
HR
17
AVG
.251
xwOBA
.318
PPG
1.45
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202441116.206.267.299.093.32730.2%6.0%24.2%10270.66—
2023126457.251
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

457 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
22
.318
xBA
35
.248
.305
.419
.168
.318
28.9%
6.8%
22.1%
17
0
183
1.45
—
2022129470.260.340.414.154.34625.3%8.5%16.8%901961.52—
202177250.284.382.465.181.36127.2%12.0%15.2%911491.94—
202041133.283.353.500.217.38323.3%8.3%15.0%60972.37—
2019110421.281.346.446.165.34626.1%7.8%18.3%1502031.85—
20182038.212.316.242.030.26231.6%10.5%21.1%00241.20—
20171445.326.341.488.162.31626.7%2.2%24.5%00211.50—
xSLG
44
.433
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
39
89.0
Median EV
22
91.0
90th % EV
68
106.3
Barrel %
61
10.3
Hard-Hit %
45
41.1
Sweet-Spot %
97
43.2
Bat Speed
Avg
73
72.0
Median
72
73.2
90th %
65
77.5
Plate Discipline
Chase %
5
39.5
Whiff %
16
28.3
K %
5
28.9
BB %
28
6.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
86
≈ 9th pctl
Chase cost
-42.2r
426 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-14.6r
244 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
52.6%
1,873 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.03
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
235+45%1113+25%8+60%15+42%19+55%33+35%34+20%204+69%13+22%32-24%46-12%56+0%37+67%27+31%16+59%27+31%49-41%56-32%72-26%46+28%29+15%13+61%23+26%39+0%40-9%33+7%27+33%153+10%10+17%12+5%20+30%1051CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000