Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Gleyber Torres

Gleyber Torres

2B·DET
Compare
Compare
PA
666
H
151
HR
15
AVG
.257
xwOBA
.315
PPG
2.07
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202641184.276.396.388.112.34417.4%15.2%2.2%401002.44—
2025158629.255
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
22
.315
xBA
35
.243
xSLG
.362
.386
.131
.365
16.1%
13.5%
2.6%
16
4
358
2.27
—
2024172666.257.334.378.121.31520.4%9.8%10.6%1553562.07—
2023163672.273.350.453.180.36314.6%10.0%4.6%25134202.58—
2022160575.255.310.448.193.32722.4%6.8%15.6%24133352.09—
2021135517.259.333.365.106.33220.1%9.7%10.4%9152561.90—
202052160.243.356.368.125.33417.5%13.8%3.7%331132.17—
2019158604.278.340.535.257.34421.4%7.9%13.5%3874652.94—
2018129484.271.343.480.209.34125.2%8.7%16.5%2462762.14—
22
.395
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
26
88.2
Median EV
32
91.5
90th % EV
18
102.6
Barrel %
21
6.3
Hard-Hit %
15
35.4
Sweet-Spot %
81
38.8
Bat Speed
Avg
23
68.5
Median
19
69.7
90th %
20
74.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
91
21.4
Whiff %
60
20.5
K %
53
20.4
BB %
63
9.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
117
≈ 96th pctl
Chase cost
-37.6r
377 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-19.4r
375 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
45.4%
2,879 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-1.98
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
1241224+22%9+44%18+7%28+47%19+11%9+0%6+28%25-15%27-29%58-11%75-7%42+42%12+14%7+23%26-15%52-35%78-28%69-13%55+40%30+0%9+9%22+15%40+21%58-12%34+13%23+0%114+0%12+0%19+0%16+0%1054CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000