Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Gleyber Torres

Gleyber Torres

2B·DET
Compare
Compare
PA
629
H
136
HR
16
AVG
.255
xwOBA
.365
PPG
2.27
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202638166.270.390.365.095.33717.5%15.7%1.8%30882.32—
2025158629.255
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
84
.365
xBA
79
.271
xSLG
.362
.386
.131
.365
16.1%
13.5%
2.6%
16
4
358
2.27
—
2024172666.257.334.378.121.31520.4%9.8%10.6%1553562.07—
2023163672.273.350.453.180.36314.6%10.0%4.6%25134202.58—
2022160575.255.310.448.193.32722.4%6.8%15.6%24133352.09—
2021135517.259.333.365.106.33220.1%9.7%10.4%9152561.90—
202052160.243.356.368.125.33417.5%13.8%3.7%331132.17—
2019158604.278.340.535.257.34421.4%7.9%13.5%3874652.94—
2018129484.271.343.480.209.34125.2%8.7%16.5%2462762.14—
66
.465
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
44
90.0
Median EV
29
91.9
90th % EV
36
104.6
Barrel %
34
8.2
Hard-Hit %
23
39.0
Sweet-Spot %
86
39.7
Bat Speed
Avg
20
68.6
Median
19
69.8
90th %
27
75.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
99
17.1
Whiff %
83
16.8
K %
79
16.1
BB %
92
13.5
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
120
≈ 98th pctl
Chase cost
-28.6r
304 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-20.3r
391 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
41.1%
2,717 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-1.80
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
143+0%6+25%81+0%6+0%10+19%16-16%19+29%14+27%112+45%11-19%26-33%46-25%61-14%44+40%25+0%6+21%19-4%46-38%95-24%79-11%47+26%27+0%7+14%22+28%36+18%40-12%56+12%26+10%104+15%13+7%27+6%18+0%11+0%1132CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000