Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jake Burger

Jake Burger

1B·TEX
Compare
Compare
PA
377
H
84
HR
16
AVG
.235
xwOBA
.326
PPG
1.66
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202664255.237.291.415.178.30426.7%6.7%20.0%1011201.88—
2025108377.235
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

377 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
39
.326
xBA
36
.244
.270
.417
.182
.326
24.7%
3.2%
21.5%
16
1
179
1.66
—
2024139579.250.303.460.210.34125.9%5.4%20.5%2912882.07—
2023147541.249.311.517.268.35827.5%5.9%21.6%3413102.11—
202257183.250.304.458.208.32730.6%5.5%25.1%80921.61—
20211542.263.333.474.211.35135.7%9.5%26.2%10151.00—
xSLG
74
.477
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
56
90.4
Median EV
53
93.4
90th % EV
85
108.0
Barrel %
80
13.9
Hard-Hit %
77
48.5
Sweet-Spot %
32
35.0
Bat Speed
Avg
88
73.1
Median
88
74.5
90th %
74
78.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
5
39.7
Whiff %
15
28.3
K %
26
24.7
BB %
1
3.2
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
83
≈ 5th pctl
Chase cost
-32.5r
319 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-10.6r
168 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
54.9%
1,373 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.14
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
1535422+40%10+20%20+33%18+24%33+46%24+71%14+50%6+43%21-3%30-22%51-16%64+3%40+71%244+38%26+14%51-37%73-30%74-8%37+80%254+42%19+41%32+15%52+24%42+0%27+23%13+14%7+19%16+20%15+12%17+50%631CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000