Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jake Meyers

Jake Meyers

OF·HOU
Compare
Compare
PA
514
H
101
HR
13
AVG
.219
xwOBA
.308
PPG
1.51
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202630110.210.275.310.100.25820.0%7.3%12.7%21381.27—
2025102382.291
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

514 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
13
.308
xBA
10
.230
.354
.372
.081
.327
17.5%
8.1%
9.4%
3
16
199
1.95
—
2024142514.219.288.359.140.30822.8%6.8%16.0%13112141.51—
2023104342.226.296.381.155.28325.7%7.6%18.1%1051441.38—
202249161.225.269.311.086.25133.5%4.3%29.2%12290.59—
202152163.260.325.438.178.32230.7%6.1%24.6%64811.56—
xSLG
19
.390
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
10
86.7
Median EV
8
89.5
90th % EV
23
103.3
Barrel %
28
6.8
Hard-Hit %
23
37.0
Sweet-Spot %
39
35.0
Bat Speed
Avg
6
66.1
Median
12
68.0
90th %
14
74.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
27
31.0
Whiff %
30
25.8
K %
38
22.8
BB %
22
6.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
97
≈ 38th pctl
Chase cost
-34.8r
356 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-13.4r
239 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.7%
1,835 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.63
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+17%653+38%8525+26%19+45%29+13%23+74%27+67%94+36%22-23%31-19%42-13%55-7%43+41%29+23%13+40%25+7%57-40%60-22%67-21%58+41%17+11%9+27%26+34%38+17%48+6%35+8%2441+25%12+28%18+7%14+0%10+0%911CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000