Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Javier Báez

Javier Báez

3B / SS / OF·DET
Compare
Compare
PA
547
H
113
HR
9
AVG
.222
xwOBA
.282
PPG
1.47
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
20262482.256.284.397.141.29319.5%2.4%17.1%21351.46—
2025136437.257
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
1
.282
xBA
9
.230
xSLG
.284
.398
.141
.271
24.9%
2.3%
22.6%
12
6
212
1.56
—
202484289.184.224.294.110.26923.9%4.2%19.7%681021.21—
2023141547.222.269.325.103.28222.9%4.4%18.5%9122071.47—
2022156592.237.278.391.154.28624.8%4.4%20.4%1792611.67—
2021145549.264.319.492.228.32333.5%5.1%28.4%31192881.99—
202063235.203.240.360.157.27431.9%3.0%28.9%83681.08—
2019139561.281.317.531.250.33527.8%5.0%22.8%29113542.55—
2018166646.290.328.554.264.34725.9%4.5%21.4%34224432.67—
2017150509.272.317.479.207.30528.3%5.9%22.4%23132821.88—
3
.357
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
20
88.0
Median EV
16
90.3
90th % EV
55
105.5
Barrel %
14
5.2
Hard-Hit %
32
39.4
Sweet-Spot %
2
29.6
Bat Speed
Avg
78
72.5
Median
78
73.9
90th %
78
78.9
Plate Discipline
Chase %
1
44.0
Whiff %
7
30.6
K %
30
22.9
BB %
3
4.4
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
64
≈ 1th pctl
Chase cost
-62.8r
574 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-15.0r
265 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
55.1%
2,018 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.85
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
25+38%8+55%11+50%6135+33%9+31%29+36%25+63%19+89%9+43%7+56%18-5%20-20%40-28%43-25%61+56%25+59%17+48%27+15%39-26%54-38%58-24%37+42%31+50%14+44%25+64%36+28%43+14%36+41%17+29%174+22%23+69%13+43%14+25%12+0%64CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000