Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jeff McNeil

Jeff McNeil

2B / OF·ATH
Compare
Compare
PA
648
H
158
HR
10
AVG
.270
xwOBA
.295
PPG
2.23
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202662225.234.306.308.074.30514.2%8.0%6.2%21821.32—
2025122462.243
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
5
.295
xBA
36
.249
xSLG
.338
.411
.168
.334
11.9%
10.6%
1.3%
12
3
265
2.17
—
2024133472.238.310.384.146.29514.4%7.4%7.0%1252471.86—
2023158648.270.335.378.108.29510.0%6.0%4.0%10103522.23—
2022160590.326.385.453.127.32710.3%6.8%3.5%954012.51—
2021126426.251.320.360.109.31613.6%6.8%6.8%732151.71—
202052209.311.388.454.143.34011.5%9.6%1.9%401222.35—
2019138567.318.385.531.213.35113.2%6.2%7.0%2354393.18—
201865248.329.381.471.142.3309.7%5.6%4.1%371612.48—
2
.345
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
3
85.3
Median EV
4
88.3
90th % EV
3
100.0
Barrel %
1
1.3
Hard-Hit %
5
27.4
Sweet-Spot %
19
33.1
Bat Speed
Avg
6
66.1
Median
9
67.7
90th %
7
72.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
35
29.9
Whiff %
97
12.2
K %
98
10.0
BB %
18
6.0
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
112
≈ 89th pctl
Chase cost
-35.9r
401 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-10.2r
214 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
52.9%
2,205 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.09
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
+0%9+0%16+0%9+33%12+15%1352+22%9+43%21+43%44+34%29+32%38+39%23+17%6+31%26+16%43-18%82-19%69-21%68+24%17+20%15+35%23+11%37-11%55-17%48-16%49+31%265+23%13+37%19+58%24+18%22+42%12+33%91+17%6245112CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000