Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jeff McNeil

Jeff McNeil

2B / OF·ATH
Compare
Compare
PA
472
H
101
HR
12
AVG
.238
xwOBA
.295
PPG
1.86
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202663228.232.307.305.073.30614.0%8.3%5.7%21831.32—
2025122462.243
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

472 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
6
.295
xBA
19
.236
.338
.411
.168
.334
11.9%
10.6%
1.3%
12
3
265
2.17
—
2024133472.238.310.384.146.29514.4%7.4%7.0%1252471.86—
2023158648.270.335.378.108.29510.0%6.0%4.0%10103522.23—
2022160590.326.385.453.127.32710.3%6.8%3.5%954012.51—
2021126426.251.320.360.109.31613.6%6.8%6.8%732151.71—
202052209.311.388.454.143.34011.5%9.6%1.9%401222.35—
2019138567.318.385.531.213.35113.2%6.2%7.0%2354393.18—
201865248.329.381.471.142.3309.7%5.6%4.1%371612.48—
xSLG
4
.351
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
10
86.7
Median EV
10
89.8
90th % EV
10
101.1
Barrel %
6
3.1
Hard-Hit %
8
31.1
Sweet-Spot %
26
33.6
Bat Speed
Avg
12
67.0
Median
13
68.5
90th %
10
73.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
29
30.6
Whiff %
83
16.1
K %
91
14.4
BB %
35
7.4
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
109
≈ 82th pctl
Chase cost
-31.9r
328 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-7.9r
161 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
54.5%
1,778 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.24
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
35+11%9+21%14+0%634+20%10+31%29+48%27+34%56+26%27+11%19+14%7+63%19+11%53-15%79-12%65-11%53+50%30+17%12+43%21+17%46-12%49-9%58-10%48+57%21+8%12+50%14+56%18+35%26+40%20+17%6+33%935245341CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000