Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jeff McNeil

Jeff McNeil

2B / OF·ATH
Compare
Compare
PA
462
H
97
HR
12
AVG
.243
xwOBA
.334
PPG
2.17
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202662225.234.306.308.074.30514.2%8.0%6.2%21821.32—
2025122462.243
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

462 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
50
.334
xBA
77
.269
.338
.411
.168
.334
11.9%
10.6%
1.3%
12
3
265
2.17
—
2024133472.238.310.384.146.29514.4%7.4%7.0%1252471.86—
2023158648.270.335.378.108.29510.0%6.0%4.0%10103522.23—
2022160590.326.385.453.127.32710.3%6.8%3.5%954012.51—
2021126426.251.320.360.109.31613.6%6.8%6.8%732151.71—
202052209.311.388.454.143.34011.5%9.6%1.9%401222.35—
2019138567.318.385.531.213.35113.2%6.2%7.0%2354393.18—
201865248.329.381.471.142.3309.7%5.6%4.1%371612.48—
xSLG
23
.399
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
9
86.7
Median EV
20
91.0
90th % EV
7
101.2
Barrel %
12
5.1
Hard-Hit %
12
32.9
Sweet-Spot %
86
39.7
Bat Speed
Avg
26
68.9
Median
23
70.3
90th %
23
74.9
Plate Discipline
Chase %
49
26.8
Whiff %
89
14.9
K %
93
11.9
BB %
72
10.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
113
≈ 90th pctl
Chase cost
-26.0r
276 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-9.5r
177 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
52.8%
1,714 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.07
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+0%8+10%20+41%17+0%12+0%10+0%91+43%21+34%29+25%36+13%47+33%30+18%22+0%7+48%21+0%48-31%67-13%83-14%49+48%29+31%13+28%18+6%36-21%47-21%56-27%41+35%17+33%12+25%12+24%17+5%20+0%18+64%11+44%923+0%64432CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000