Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jo Adell

Jo Adell

OF·LAA
Compare
Compare
PA
573
H
124
HR
37
AVG
.236
xwOBA
.367
PPG
2.07
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202668278.238.283.385.147.33323.7%2.5%21.2%1031241.82—
2025153573.236
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
85
.367
xBA
46
.253
xSLG
.293
.485
.249
.367
26.4%
5.8%
20.6%
37
5
317
2.07
—
2024132451.207.282.402.195.31627.9%7.8%20.1%20142211.67—
20232062.207.258.448.241.23840.3%6.5%33.8%31251.25—
2022100285.224.265.373.149.25037.5%3.9%33.6%87850.85—
202136140.246.295.408.162.30922.9%5.7%17.2%42752.08—
202035132.161.212.266.105.22941.7%5.3%36.4%3020.06—
92
.537
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
80
91.7
Median EV
83
95.0
90th % EV
92
109.0
Barrel %
93
17.3
Hard-Hit %
85
50.0
Sweet-Spot %
50
35.9
Bat Speed
Avg
98
75.3
Median
97
77.2
90th %
98
82.5
Plate Discipline
Chase %
17
32.8
Whiff %
24
26.5
K %
14
26.4
BB %
14
5.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
91
≈ 18th pctl
Chase cost
-45.7r
430 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-18.4r
258 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
52.6%
2,245 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.86
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
111343+33%6+20%15+13%23+27%22+14%21+23%134+32%19+13%31-20%56-17%52-20%56+59%17+43%7+50%34+21%53-22%67-19%62-19%52+23%31+20%10+52%25+39%44+9%44+27%33+5%22+7%14+0%7+33%15+18%11+20%20+17%12432CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000