Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. OF peers

Rank #223 of 234

Each bar is one OF, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150+200Jorge Barrosa
Jorge Barrosa · #60
V⁻ —VORP -12V⁺ —
Jorge Barrosa

Jorge Barrosa

OF·ARI
Compare
Compare
PA
108
H
16
HR
1
AVG
.165
xwOBA
.204
PPG
0.68
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj24104.223.290.328.104.28123.6%8.1%15.5%12361.52—
202637108.165
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

108 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.204
xBA
0
.143
.236
.309
.144
.204
29.6%
7.4%
22.2%
1
0
25
0.68
—
20252877.141.176.225.084.19228.6%2.6%26.0%10120.43—
2024818.176.176.294.118.34811.1%0.0%11.1%0181.00—
xSLG
0
.221
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
0
79.8
Median EV
9
88.0
90th % EV
3
98.5
Barrel %
25
6.1
Hard-Hit %
1
19.7
Sweet-Spot %
40
34.8
Bat Speed
Avg
9
66.5
Median
15
68.6
90th %
13
72.9
Plate Discipline
Chase %
41
31.3
Whiff %
28
25.5
K %
10
29.6
BB %
25
7.4
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
97
≈ 37th pctl
Chase cost
-5.1r
50 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.6r
48 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
42.6%
289 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.66
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
1113335+35%17+31%13+14%7+0%62+45%11+12%17-27%15-50%22-14%14+17%6+33%6+50%6-30%10-28%18-47%17+9%1131+22%9+13%82+0%8334211CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 289