Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jorge Polanco

Jorge Polanco

2B·NYM
Compare
Compare
PA
524
H
125
HR
26
AVG
.265
xwOBA
.344
PPG
2.49
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
20261461.179.246.286.107.27018.0%8.2%9.8%10151.07—
2025152524.265
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
64
.344
xBA
75
.268
xSLG
.329
.495
.230
.344
15.6%
8.0%
7.6%
26
6
379
2.49
—
2024122469.213.298.355.142.31429.2%9.8%19.4%1641691.39—
202386344.254.337.452.198.35025.6%10.5%15.1%1451862.16—
2022115446.234.348.404.170.36621.3%14.3%7.0%1632412.10—
2021158644.269.326.503.234.34718.3%7.0%11.3%33124462.82—
202058226.258.305.354.096.30415.5%5.8%9.7%44971.67—
2019159704.295.360.485.190.34316.5%8.5%8.0%2254572.87—
201877333.288.347.427.139.30418.6%7.5%11.1%671812.35—
2017141544.256.316.410.154.29214.3%7.5%6.8%13143242.30—
69
.470
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
40
89.9
Median EV
62
93.7
90th % EV
53
105.8
Barrel %
55
10.3
Hard-Hit %
55
45.8
Sweet-Spot %
40
35.5
Bat Speed
Avg
23
68.8
Median
34
70.8
90th %
31
75.5
Plate Discipline
Chase %
49
26.8
Whiff %
55
21.7
K %
80
15.6
BB %
42
8.0
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
100
≈ 52th pctl
Chase cost
-37.7r
353 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-14.4r
286 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
46.6%
2,075 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.51
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
4+17%6+11%9+18%11+0%1031+18%17+39%18+27%33+12%33+29%35+17%185+46%26-9%53-29%65-23%61-18%45+44%18+8%12+33%33+0%43-30%70-29%65-29%28+55%205+19%21+21%29+22%32+11%27+50%20+38%81+17%6+25%8+14%7533CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000