Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Jorge Soler

Jorge Soler

OF·LAA
Compare
Compare
PA
574
H
119
HR
21
AVG
.241
xwOBA
.354
PPG
2.08
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202658244.219.303.400.181.30631.1%9.0%22.1%90971.67—
202586315.215
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
79
.354
xBA
40
.244
xSLG
.296
.387
.172
.296
29.8%
8.9%
20.9%
12
0
115
1.34
—
2024149574.241.340.442.201.35424.6%11.8%12.8%2123102.08—
2023145581.250.343.511.261.37824.3%11.4%12.9%3623392.34—
202277306.207.296.400.193.33329.4%10.1%19.3%1311351.75—
2021167602.223.319.432.209.36423.6%11.1%12.5%2703482.08—
202044174.228.327.443.215.35834.5%10.9%23.6%80661.50—
2019167680.264.355.568.304.39926.2%10.7%15.5%4834642.78—
201866257.265.357.466.201.35026.8%10.9%15.9%931251.89—
201736110.144.245.258.114.27032.7%10.9%21.8%20260.72—
71
.466
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
67
90.5
Median EV
56
92.8
90th % EV
82
108.0
Barrel %
79
12.6
Hard-Hit %
61
44.1
Sweet-Spot %
39
35.1
Bat Speed
Avg
91
73.8
Median
90
75.1
90th %
86
79.7
Plate Discipline
Chase %
53
26.8
Whiff %
20
27.1
K %
28
24.6
BB %
91
11.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
95
≈ 32th pctl
Chase cost
-40.9r
392 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-22.8r
349 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
44.5%
2,383 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.67
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
343+0%6532+0%7+25%16-12%24+19%26+8%26+18%11+13%8+13%16+9%34-37%41-28%53-23%43+23%26+30%10+36%25-7%46-37%63-33%64-43%44+41%223+16%32+22%41+27%52+0%43-6%16+15%131+18%11+6%18+11%9+25%1651CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000