Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. 3B peers

Rank #23 of 57

Each bar is one 3B, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-200-1000+100Josh Jung
Josh Jung · #23
V⁻ -70VORP -7V⁺ -27
Josh Jung

Josh Jung

3B·TEX
Compare
Compare
PA
396
H
104
HR
9
AVG
.294
xwOBA
.346
PPG
2.24
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj88382.258.308.418.160.32122.2%6.2%16.0%1221802.05—
202692396.294
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
61
.346
xBA
86
.286
xSLG
.364
.441
.147
.346
17.9%
8.3%
9.6%
9
1
206
2.24
—
2025132511.251.294.390.139.30625.2%5.3%19.9%1442071.57—
202449188.264.299.421.157.29625.5%4.3%21.2%74741.51—
2023146515.266.316.467.201.33429.3%5.8%23.5%2313012.06—
202226102.204.235.418.214.29038.2%3.9%34.3%52311.19—
55
.432
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
69
90.6
Median EV
84
95.7
90th % EV
36
103.9
Barrel %
27
6.3
Hard-Hit %
83
48.3
Sweet-Spot %
88
40.9
Bat Speed
Avg
29
69.0
Median
35
70.7
90th %
33
75.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
55
28.8
Whiff %
78
17.1
K %
68
17.9
BB %
38
8.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
85
≈ 7th pctl
Chase cost
-5.7r
52 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-3.2r
48 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
46.6%
281 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.16
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
21211+29%73+0%75+50%6+22%9+0%10-47%15-22%18+17%6+88%81+0%7+9%11-37%19-42%26-10%2052+50%8+22%9+17%12-22%9+0%62122422CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 281