Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
J.T. Realmuto

J.T. Realmuto

C·PHI
Compare
Compare
PA
550
H
129
HR
12
AVG
.257
xwOBA
.318
PPG
1.70
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202644161.211.300.303.092.32518.0%8.1%9.9%32561.27—
2025141550.257
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
26
.318
xBA
40
.249
xSLG
.317
.384
.127
.318
23.5%
6.4%
17.1%
12
8
240
1.70
—
2024107414.265.322.428.163.34224.6%6.5%18.1%1421991.86—
2023152540.252.313.452.200.33725.6%6.5%19.1%20163102.04—
2022168563.275.344.477.202.35521.1%7.3%13.8%22214012.39—
2021138538.262.343.438.176.33324.0%8.9%15.1%17133112.25—
202049195.266.349.491.225.35524.6%8.2%16.4%1141332.71—
2019150594.275.332.492.217.34420.7%6.9%13.8%2593762.51—
2018126529.277.343.484.207.35119.7%7.2%12.5%2133292.61—
2017149579.278.333.451.173.33818.3%6.2%12.1%1783382.27—
26
.407
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
44
90.0
Median EV
36
92.4
90th % EV
53
105.8
Barrel %
39
8.8
Hard-Hit %
53
45.5
Sweet-Spot %
71
38.0
Bat Speed
Avg
47
70.4
Median
39
71.4
90th %
58
77.4
Plate Discipline
Chase %
19
32.3
Whiff %
60
21.3
K %
32
23.5
BB %
24
6.4
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
87
≈ 10th pctl
Chase cost
-45.0r
421 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-21.6r
341 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.4%
2,227 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.99
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
21+33%6+11%9+0%8+0%61+17%6+26%23+32%22+7%27+26%23+50%6+29%7+45%22-2%41-35%65-31%61-29%42+31%26+42%19+52%21+4%50-33%70-32%60-32%37+48%21+38%8+25%20+41%32+45%42+24%29+14%22+54%131+0%12+9%11+15%13+40%10+8%12+0%71CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000