Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Keibert Ruiz

Keibert Ruiz

C·WSN
Compare
Compare
PA
562
H
136
HR
18
AVG
.260
xwOBA
.323
PPG
2.30
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202641139.273.299.492.219.26013.7%2.9%10.8%51962.34—
202571267.247
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
28
.323
xBA
75
.270
xSLG
.278
.318
.071
.287
9.7%
3.0%
6.7%
2
1
118
1.66
—
2024129485.229.263.359.130.28311.1%3.3%7.8%1332481.92—
2023142562.260.309.409.149.32310.3%5.5%4.8%1813272.30—
2022119433.251.314.360.109.33011.5%6.9%4.6%762291.92—
20213296.273.333.409.136.3099.4%6.3%3.1%30672.09—
202038.250.250.625.375.34637.5%0.0%37.5%1051.67—
39
.425
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
12
87.4
Median EV
13
89.6
90th % EV
9
101.8
Barrel %
19
5.8
Hard-Hit %
9
31.9
Sweet-Spot %
94
40.7
Bat Speed
Avg
3
64.8
Median
3
66.0
90th %
4
71.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
10
36.5
Whiff %
95
13.0
K %
97
10.3
BB %
10
5.5
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
89
≈ 14th pctl
Chase cost
-43.1r
429 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-12.7r
275 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
50.8%
1,906 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.93
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
55+19%16+9%11+8%1234+30%10+54%28+28%54+24%38+24%17+38%135+34%35+16%55-37%59-40%70-22%32+70%23+63%16+59%37-4%47-39%71-18%40-33%39+55%205+24%17+59%17+27%30+10%21+33%215425+33%65+0%62CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000