Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Ketel Marte

Ketel Marte

2B·ARI
Compare
Compare
PA
583
H
147
HR
36
AVG
.292
xwOBA
.401
PPG
3.20
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202665286.247.300.441.194.36815.7%7.0%8.7%1101692.60—
2025131556.283
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
94
.401
xBA
92
.290
xSLG
.378
.517
.234
.395
14.9%
11.5%
3.4%
28
4
427
3.26
—
2024141583.292.378.560.268.40118.2%11.1%7.1%3674513.20—
2023171651.275.361.484.209.34316.7%10.9%5.8%25114752.78—
2022147559.239.323.406.167.32018.1%9.8%8.3%1252972.02—
202196374.318.378.532.214.37516.0%8.3%7.7%1422722.83—
202047196.286.326.407.121.30610.7%3.6%7.1%211062.26—
2019150628.329.390.592.263.37713.7%8.4%5.3%32105093.39—
2018155581.259.332.436.177.32313.6%9.3%4.3%1473512.26—
201780255.260.348.395.135.35114.5%11.4%3.1%531491.86—
92
.549
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
96
93.7
Median EV
92
95.8
90th % EV
87
108.5
Barrel %
76
12.3
Hard-Hit %
94
53.8
Sweet-Spot %
38
34.9
Bat Speed
Avg
77
72.2
Median
73
73.1
90th %
84
79.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
61
26.0
Whiff %
68
19.3
K %
65
18.2
BB %
82
11.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
109
≈ 81th pctl
Chase cost
-34.8r
366 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-14.7r
277 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
48.1%
2,196 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.25
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+0%7+10%10+0%22+0%8+0%61+31%16+19%26+6%34-17%29+0%29+20%15+0%8+32%22+0%31-24%58-28%72-28%47+41%29+0%11+48%29+24%51-28%68-17%58-12%34+48%23+40%10+8%12+50%24+0%24+31%26+8%24+43%1443+33%6+14%7+0%631CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000