Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Ketel Marte

Ketel Marte

2B·ARI
Compare
Compare
PA
556
H
136
HR
28
AVG
.283
xwOBA
.395
PPG
3.26
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202662267.246.303.443.197.37115.4%7.5%7.9%1101672.69—
2025131556.283
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
95
.395
xBA
93
.283
xSLG
.378
.517
.234
.395
14.9%
11.5%
3.4%
28
4
427
3.26
—
2024141583.292.378.560.268.40118.2%11.1%7.1%3674513.20—
2023171651.275.361.484.209.34316.7%10.9%5.8%25114752.78—
2022147559.239.323.406.167.32018.1%9.8%8.3%1252972.02—
202196374.318.378.532.214.37516.0%8.3%7.7%1422722.83—
202047196.286.326.407.121.30610.7%3.6%7.1%211062.26—
2019150628.329.390.592.263.37713.7%8.4%5.3%32105093.39—
2018155581.259.332.436.177.32313.6%9.3%4.3%1473512.26—
201780255.260.348.395.135.35114.5%11.4%3.1%531491.86—
91
.534
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
61
90.7
Median EV
65
93.8
90th % EV
74
107.4
Barrel %
77
13.5
Hard-Hit %
67
47.0
Sweet-Spot %
15
33.3
Bat Speed
Avg
85
72.9
Median
82
74.0
90th %
93
80.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
66
24.8
Whiff %
67
19.9
K %
82
14.9
BB %
78
11.5
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
109
≈ 81th pctl
Chase cost
-31.6r
331 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-15.2r
283 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
45.5%
2,115 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.21
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
24+10%10+0%13+0%931+25%8+41%17+9%23+7%40+9%35+22%23+0%7+37%27+17%42-37%54-22%55-25%56+32%28+38%13+58%19+0%51-20%45-32%78-14%43+41%29+18%11+29%14+16%19+24%33+8%37+12%17+20%153433+8%12+0%641CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000