Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Kyle Isbel

Kyle Isbel

OF·KCR
Compare
Compare
PA
409
H
94
HR
4
AVG
.255
xwOBA
.251
PPG
1.22
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202655180.241.293.352.111.27222.8%5.0%17.8%34601.09—
2025129409.255
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

409 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.251
xBA
7
.226
.303
.353
.098
.251
18.1%
5.6%
12.5%
4
4
157
1.22
—
2024141426.229.288.367.138.28320.7%6.3%14.4%8102071.47—
202393314.239.283.379.140.29018.8%5.4%13.4%571601.72—
2022100278.211.265.340.129.26927.0%5.8%21.2%591331.33—
20213584.273.333.429.156.25427.4%8.3%19.1%13591.69—
xSLG
0
.298
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
0
83.7
Median EV
4
88.5
90th % EV
23
103.7
Barrel %
1
1.6
Hard-Hit %
17
36.1
Sweet-Spot %
0
27.1
Bat Speed
Avg
18
68.0
Median
20
70.0
90th %
18
74.4
Plate Discipline
Chase %
52
26.6
Whiff %
85
16.3
K %
69
18.1
BB %
12
5.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
98
≈ 44th pctl
Chase cost
-22.5r
224 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-15.3r
271 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
45.3%
1,463 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.58
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+0%7+13%8+38%13+0%11+0%6+0%92+33%9+59%17-9%33+2%43+24%25+4%25+0%11+39%23-5%55-34%80-47%83-35%60+8%25+29%7+33%30-16%43-35%52-29%42-27%40+53%19+50%6+17%12+29%24+21%24+16%19+33%185343+38%8222CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000