Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Luis García Jr.

Luis García Jr.

1B / 2B·WSN
Compare
Compare
PA
528
H
141
HR
18
AVG
.282
xwOBA
.337
PPG
2.24
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202664221.259.286.458.199.33315.4%3.6%11.8%821402.19—
2025141528.251
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
55
.337
xBA
83
.276
xSLG
.293
.410
.159
.340
15.9%
5.1%
10.8%
16
14
299
2.12
—
2024144528.282.319.444.162.33716.3%5.1%11.2%18233222.24—
2023127484.265.307.383.118.31012.4%5.6%6.8%992672.10—
202298377.275.298.408.133.30622.3%2.9%19.4%741561.59—
202176247.242.275.411.169.28117.4%4.5%12.9%601271.67—
202040139.276.302.366.090.29620.9%3.6%17.3%21601.50—
69
.465
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
33
88.5
Median EV
37
91.8
90th % EV
45
104.6
Barrel %
43
8.0
Hard-Hit %
49
41.7
Sweet-Spot %
33
34.5
Bat Speed
Avg
50
70.1
Median
40
71.1
90th %
48
76.5
Plate Discipline
Chase %
9
35.7
Whiff %
70
19.0
K %
80
16.3
BB %
7
5.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
91
≈ 18th pctl
Chase cost
-38.6r
411 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-14.3r
257 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
51.5%
1,880 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.82
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+13%85+0%7+29%14+18%1752+33%15+32%34+10%52+28%46+27%22+44%9+17%6+39%31+9%55-41%63-26%74-21%53+53%19+57%7+23%31+38%40-24%58-24%50-19%36+80%10+75%12+43%14+32%19+33%15+28%18+70%10+71%7243+57%7+29%7231CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000