Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Luis García Jr.

Luis García Jr.

1B / 2B·WSN
Compare
Compare
PA
528
H
123
HR
16
AVG
.251
xwOBA
.340
PPG
2.12
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202662212.261.289.448.187.33314.6%3.8%10.8%721382.23—
2025141528.251
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
61
.340
xBA
94
.285
xSLG
.293
.410
.159
.340
15.9%
5.1%
10.8%
16
14
299
2.12
—
2024144528.282.319.444.162.33716.3%5.1%11.2%18233222.24—
2023127484.265.307.383.118.31012.4%5.6%6.8%992672.10—
202298377.275.298.408.133.30622.3%2.9%19.4%741561.59—
202176247.242.275.411.169.28117.4%4.5%12.9%601271.67—
202040139.276.302.366.090.29620.9%3.6%17.3%21601.50—
74
.478
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
50
90.1
Median EV
61
93.6
90th % EV
42
105.2
Barrel %
43
9.0
Hard-Hit %
55
45.8
Sweet-Spot %
33
35.1
Bat Speed
Avg
52
70.6
Median
47
71.9
90th %
50
77.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
6
37.7
Whiff %
72
19.3
K %
80
15.9
BB %
8
5.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
85
≈ 6th pctl
Chase cost
-44.9r
431 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-12.0r
225 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
53.8%
1,845 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-3.09
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
4+17%6+17%12+33%12+31%13+14%71+12%17+48%23+19%52+46%41+58%33+27%113+27%37+2%48-25%60-27%66-8%59+86%22+64%11+38%29-4%53-21%63-22%51-20%35+75%205+29%14+25%16+19%21+20%15+82%11+63%814143CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000