Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Luis Rengifo

Luis Rengifo

2B / 3B·MIL
Compare
Compare
PA
446
H
104
HR
16
AVG
.263
xwOBA
.323
PPG
2.15
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202654201.198.279.249.051.29711.9%9.5%2.4%03801.48—
2025151543.237
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

446 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
28
.323
xBA
19
.239
.288
.334
.097
.302
19.2%
6.1%
13.1%
9
10
210
1.39
—
202480307.297.343.413.116.30014.3%5.2%9.1%6241892.36—
2023130446.263.342.443.180.32318.4%9.2%9.2%1662802.15—
2022133513.263.293.428.165.29915.4%3.3%12.1%1762581.94—
202159191.200.247.309.109.29619.9%4.7%15.2%61691.17—
202030106.156.269.200.044.25924.5%13.2%11.3%13240.80—
2019108406.238.323.364.126.30622.9%9.9%13.0%711651.53—
xSLG
22
.400
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
41
89.1
Median EV
34
91.5
90th % EV
17
103.3
Barrel %
37
7.6
Hard-Hit %
18
36.4
Sweet-Spot %
7
31.3
Bat Speed
Avg
38
69.8
Median
32
70.7
90th %
33
75.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
41
28.7
Whiff %
40
23.2
K %
63
18.4
BB %
51
9.2
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
105
≈ 70th pctl
Chase cost
-29.6r
316 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-10.3r
170 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
50.1%
1,700 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.34
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
34+0%7+6%16+0%13+0%63+67%6+25%20+6%31+19%31+24%29+13%155+57%28+4%52-24%50-15%65-7%41+50%22+0%6+41%34+0%44-13%69-17%70-17%29+25%20+10%10+44%25+48%27+22%36+14%22+21%14+14%724+18%11+13%84+14%71CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000