Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Luis Rengifo

Luis Rengifo

2B / 3B·MIL
Compare
Compare
PA
307
H
85
HR
6
AVG
.297
xwOBA
.300
PPG
2.36
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202655205.204.284.254.050.29811.7%9.3%2.4%03811.47—
2025151543.237
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

307 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
6
.300
xBA
62
.258
.288
.334
.097
.302
19.2%
6.1%
13.1%
9
10
210
1.39
—
202480307.297.343.413.116.30014.3%5.2%9.1%6241892.36—
2023130446.263.342.443.180.32318.4%9.2%9.2%1662802.15—
2022133513.263.293.428.165.29915.4%3.3%12.1%1762581.94—
202159191.200.247.309.109.29619.9%4.7%15.2%61691.17—
202030106.156.269.200.044.25924.5%13.2%11.3%13240.80—
2019108406.238.323.364.126.30622.9%9.9%13.0%711651.53—
xSLG
5
.354
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
11
86.8
Median EV
8
89.4
90th % EV
10
101.1
Barrel %
4
2.5
Hard-Hit %
10
32.5
Sweet-Spot %
10
31.3
Bat Speed
Avg
19
68.1
Median
15
69.0
90th %
29
75.3
Plate Discipline
Chase %
10
35.6
Whiff %
57
20.9
K %
91
14.3
BB %
8
5.2
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
103
≈ 62th pctl
Chase cost
-22.4r
258 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-4.2r
88 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
56.2%
1,092 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.43
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
4+33%9+18%22+9%11+15%13+0%61+50%14+35%26+28%36+42%38+21%34+27%15+0%11+53%36+15%55-19%58-16%63+13%30+71%17+0%7+46%24-6%48-15%59-15%62+6%34+60%15+13%8+41%17+36%25+39%28+18%28+14%14+33%915+40%10+20%1052CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000