Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Luis Robert Jr.

Luis Robert Jr.

OF·NYM
Compare
Compare
PA
596
H
144
HR
38
AVG
.263
xwOBA
.353
PPG
2.46
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
20262498.224.327.329.105.32317.3%13.3%4.0%22441.83—
2025111431.223
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
71
.353
xBA
47
.255
xSLG
.300
.364
.141
.328
26.0%
9.3%
16.7%
14
33
226
2.04
—
2024103425.224.279.379.155.28633.2%6.6%26.6%14231471.43—
2023147596.263.316.541.278.35328.9%5.0%23.9%38203612.46—
2022105401.284.320.426.142.33819.2%4.2%15.0%12122652.52—
202180296.338.381.567.229.38720.6%4.7%15.9%1392242.80—
202062227.233.305.436.203.33232.2%8.8%23.4%1191201.94—
84
.515
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
41
89.1
Median EV
32
91.4
90th % EV
83
107.6
Barrel %
92
15.4
Hard-Hit %
52
42.3
Sweet-Spot %
91
39.6
Bat Speed
Avg
91
74.2
Median
94
75.8
90th %
94
80.7
Plate Discipline
Chase %
3
40.5
Whiff %
5
31.3
K %
5
28.9
BB %
5
5.0
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
90
≈ 15th pctl
Chase cost
-52.9r
517 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-11.3r
207 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
58.3%
2,199 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.92
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
2+0%7+0%64+11%943+50%14+38%16+14%14+8%12+26%23+50%12+43%7+31%13+25%36-16%49-6%52-14%49+35%20+50%12+44%25+24%42-13%70-11%66-13%39+41%17+31%13+32%28+54%41+35%49+35%34+24%29+43%143+8%12+38%16+53%19+13%8341CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000