Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. 1B peers

Rank #11 of 41

Each bar is one 1B, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100Michael Busch
Michael Busch · #11
V⁻ -2VORP 9V⁺ 67
Michael Busch

Michael Busch

1B·CHC
Compare
Compare
PA
469
H
96
HR
13
AVG
.247
xwOBA
.341
PPG
2.20
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj90387.247.340.451.204.35123.9%11.2%12.7%1622112.35—
2026104469.247
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
58
.341
xBA
22
.233
xSLG
.370
.404
.157
.341
23.2%
14.1%
9.1%
13
2
229
2.20
—
2025165586.264.346.528.264.38323.2%9.4%13.8%3444032.44—
2024154568.247.337.439.192.32628.5%11.1%17.4%2122721.77—
20232881.167.250.292.125.26833.3%9.9%23.4%21260.93—
42
.408
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
31
88.4
Median EV
12
88.4
90th % EV
3
98.7
Barrel %
55
9.9
Hard-Hit %
39
40.6
Sweet-Spot %
62
37.5
Bat Speed
Avg
5
65.8
Median
6
67.1
90th %
10
72.7
Plate Discipline
Chase %
78
24.8
Whiff %
35
24.2
K %
32
23.2
BB %
92
14.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
101
≈ 52th pctl
Chase cost
-5.5r
52 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-2.4r
47 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
42.2%
313 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.50
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
5123225+0%8+0%14+0%14+14%7+13%82+10%10-7%14-27%22-35%17+14%741+25%8+23%13-29%21-23%22+0%13+43%714+13%8+10%10+20%10+33%9242513CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 313