Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Mike Trout

Mike Trout

OF·LAA
Compare
Compare
PA
558
H
106
HR
26
AVG
.231
xwOBA
.367
PPG
1.95
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202667300.220.387.441.221.42224.3%20.3%4.0%1451812.70—
2025135558.231
2025 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
85
.367
xBA
15
.233
xSLG
.361
.437
.206
.367
31.9%
15.6%
16.3%
26
2
263
1.95
—
202434126.220.325.541.321.41221.4%12.7%8.7%106952.79—
202385363.262.368.489.227.39328.7%12.4%16.3%1822022.38—
2022126500.282.369.629.347.40527.8%10.8%17.0%4013682.92—
202144146.333.466.624.291.43728.1%18.5%9.6%821192.70—
202056241.281.397.603.322.43423.2%14.5%8.7%1711923.43—
2019140600.291.441.645.354.47120.0%18.3%1.7%45115463.90—
2018147608.312.463.628.316.45420.4%20.1%0.3%39255253.57—
2017124507.306.445.629.323.43817.8%18.5%-0.7%33244733.81—
71
.471
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
66
90.9
Median EV
80
94.7
90th % EV
84
107.9
Barrel %
88
15.8
Hard-Hit %
82
49.3
Sweet-Spot %
99
46.1
Bat Speed
Avg
74
72.0
Median
80
73.9
90th %
65
78.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
90
20.8
Whiff %
20
27.0
K %
1
31.9
BB %
97
15.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
104
≈ 66th pctl
Chase cost
-32.6r
308 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-27.7r
450 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
38.6%
2,540 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.37
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
31231+25%8-33%12-8%12+10%21+0%15+0%8+50%12+57%14-26%42-25%40-39%64+5%37+0%17+68%22+2%46-24%42-29%72-42%77-3%58+0%25+50%12+30%30+22%46+11%35-2%46+8%26+0%10+17%12+15%13+17%12+0%13+0%65CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000