Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Mitch Haniger

Mitch Haniger

H·FA
Compare
Compare
PA
425
H
79
HR
12
AVG
.207
xwOBA
.299
PPG
1.10
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
2024125425.207.285.332.125.29929.6%9.4%20.2%1201381.10—
202361230.208
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

425 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
6
.299
xBA
3
.214
.266
.363
.155
.313
28.3%
6.5%
21.8%
6
1
85
1.39
—
202273247.246.310.429.183.33426.3%8.1%18.2%1101371.88—
2021162693.252.321.484.232.34924.4%7.8%16.6%3914172.57—
201964285.218.314.460.242.33328.4%10.5%17.9%1541492.33—
2018163687.283.368.490.207.36921.5%10.2%11.3%2684262.61—
2017105412.280.350.488.208.32922.6%7.5%15.1%1662602.48—
201635123.229.311.404.175.31822.0%9.8%12.2%50551.57—
xSLG
14
.380
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
67
90.5
Median EV
80
94.3
90th % EV
39
104.2
Barrel %
49
9.0
Hard-Hit %
69
45.9
Sweet-Spot %
11
31.8
Bat Speed
Avg
62
71.0
Median
63
72.3
90th %
56
76.8
Plate Discipline
Chase %
77
23.9
Whiff %
7
30.4
K %
4
29.6
BB %
61
9.4
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
104
≈ 64th pctl
Chase cost
-27.6r
260 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-15.2r
273 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
44.1%
1,775 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.41
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+0%952434+43%7+26%19+6%18+36%33+40%15+29%14+0%8+38%24-18%44-32%50-19%43-8%52+35%34-5%19+17%30-2%48-25%65-31%65-29%49+25%24+13%8+13%16+23%35+18%57-15%40-9%23+13%81+0%9+0%10+31%16+0%6511CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000