Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. 3B peers

Rank #17 of 41

Each bar is one 3B, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150Munetaka Murakami
Munetaka Murakami · #17
V⁻ -35VORP 10V⁺ 36
Munetaka Murakami

Munetaka Murakami

1B / 3B·CHW
Compare
Compare
PA
246
H
48
HR
20
AVG
.240
xwOBA
.386
PPG
2.84
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj68292.226.346.478.252.36532.9%14.8%18.1%1841532.26—
202657246.240
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
89
.386
xBA
9
.220
xSLG
.380
.560
.320
.386
32.5%
17.9%
14.6%
20
1
162
2.84
—
90
.529
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
95
94.2
Median EV
96
100.2
90th % EV
94
110.0
Barrel %
96
20.7
Hard-Hit %
99
58.7
Sweet-Spot %
8
30.6
Bat Speed
Avg
83
73.3
Median
80
74.5
90th %
79
79.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
90
21.9
Whiff %
0
38.9
K %
2
32.5
BB %
97
17.9
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
108
≈ 80th pctl
Chase cost
-5.2r
51 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-3.6r
57 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
39.9%
406 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.18
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
3+17%62+0%63+0%613+20%10+29%7+0%11+21%14+0%6+0%6+22%9+18%22-29%21-35%31-36%22+11%9+0%7+25%8-5%21-39%23-21%33-11%9+27%112+17%6+14%7+38%84+30%101212111CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 406