Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. OF peers

Rank #150 of 234

Each bar is one OF, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-500+50+100+150+200Parker Meadows
Parker Meadows · #60
V⁻ -7VORP -7V⁺ 3
Parker Meadows

Parker Meadows

OF·DET
Compare
Compare
PA
39
H
9
HR
0
AVG
.250
xwOBA
.249
PPG
1.08
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj33142.226.299.369.143.30025.1%9.0%16.1%34581.77—
20261239.250
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

39 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.249
xBA
4
.212
.308
.333
.083
.249
25.6%
5.1%
20.5%
0
3
13
1.08
—
202564213.215.292.330.115.29526.3%9.9%16.4%44681.06—
202487298.244.311.433.189.30225.5%8.4%17.1%9131721.98—
202339145.232.333.368.136.32825.5%11.7%13.8%37782.00—
xSLG
0
.277
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
5
85.3
Median EV
9
88.2
90th % EV
2
98.0
Barrel %
13
3.8
Hard-Hit %
1
19.2
Sweet-Spot %
10
30.8
Bat Speed
Avg
34
69.0
Median
22
69.5
90th %
13
73.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
57
27.9
Whiff %
67
18.9
K %
21
25.6
BB %
9
5.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
102
≈ 59th pctl
Chase cost
-2.6r
32 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-1.7r
29 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
46.1%
178 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.43
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
112123+22%944424+33%12-33%18-30%10-36%11+43%754+38%8-40%10-25%8-25%841+0%7352512CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 178