Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Paul DeJong

Paul DeJong

3B·FA
Compare
Compare
PA
400
H
77
HR
14
AVG
.207
xwOBA
.277
PPG
1.09
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202558209.227.272.371.144.26033.5%5.3%28.2%64581.00—
2024140482.227
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

400 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.277
xBA
3
.216
.279
.427
.200
.293
32.4%
4.8%
27.6%
24
2
182
1.30
—
2023110400.207.259.355.148.27730.3%5.3%25.0%1441201.09—
202280238.156.246.284.128.27333.2%8.8%24.4%63891.11—
2021120402.197.285.390.193.31125.6%8.7%16.9%1951781.48—
202049174.250.329.349.099.31528.7%9.8%18.9%31811.65—
2019174664.233.321.444.211.33222.4%9.3%13.1%30103812.19—
2018120490.241.316.433.192.32825.1%7.3%17.8%1912622.18—
2017116443.285.326.532.247.33628.0%4.7%23.3%2512492.15—
xSLG
3
.361
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
6
85.5
Median EV
9
89.1
90th % EV
14
102.8
Barrel %
28
6.7
Hard-Hit %
10
33.2
Sweet-Spot %
47
36.0
Bat Speed
Avg
16
67.5
Median
16
69.1
90th %
12
73.2
Plate Discipline
Chase %
12
35.9
Whiff %
3
32.9
K %
4
30.3
BB %
8
5.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
96
≈ 35th pctl
Chase cost
-29.7r
316 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-8.4r
176 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
53.2%
1,424 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.68
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
34+17%6532+29%7+54%13+54%24+32%22+43%14+60%15-14%7+39%18-7%40-18%67-12%43-14%42+84%32+64%11+58%24+0%54-29%68-20%71+0%38+70%33+50%8+22%23+26%31+21%58-21%38+7%15+8%132+11%9+14%7+0%7+0%13+0%641CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000