Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Paul DeJong

Paul DeJong

3B·FA
Compare
Compare
PA
482
H
101
HR
24
AVG
.227
xwOBA
.293
PPG
1.30
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202558209.227.272.371.144.26033.5%5.3%28.2%64581.00—
2024140482.227
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

482 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
6
.293
xBA
4
.217
.279
.427
.200
.293
32.4%
4.8%
27.6%
24
2
182
1.30
—
2023110400.207.259.355.148.27730.3%5.3%25.0%1441201.09—
202280238.156.246.284.128.27333.2%8.8%24.4%63891.11—
2021120402.197.285.390.193.31125.6%8.7%16.9%1951781.48—
202049174.250.329.349.099.31528.7%9.8%18.9%31811.65—
2019174664.233.321.444.211.33222.4%9.3%13.1%30103812.19—
2018120490.241.316.433.192.32825.1%7.3%17.8%1912622.18—
2017116443.285.326.532.247.33628.0%4.7%23.3%2512492.15—
xSLG
28
.406
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
19
87.8
Median EV
32
91.5
90th % EV
49
104.9
Barrel %
60
10.2
Hard-Hit %
48
41.5
Sweet-Spot %
72
37.4
Bat Speed
Avg
61
70.9
Median
54
71.6
90th %
35
75.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
13
34.3
Whiff %
1
32.9
K %
1
32.4
BB %
6
4.8
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
101
≈ 52th pctl
Chase cost
-38.9r
376 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-7.8r
156 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
58.0%
1,862 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.51
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
1154+33%631+40%10+43%14+41%17+21%33+35%20+53%153+47%15+10%30-14%57-14%56-9%46+32%28+38%13+71%38+21%57-21%62-14%64-8%48+63%19+21%14+29%24+55%29+30%43-10%41+6%16+18%113+10%10+6%16+8%13+0%6351CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000