Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Position cohort

Hitting value vs. C peers

Rank #48 of 66

Each bar is one C, ordered left-to-right by Value (blended). Center dot is VORP; whiskers span V⁻ → V⁺. This player is highlighted in blue.

-300-200-1000+100Pedro Pagés
Pedro Pagés · #48
V⁻ —VORP -299V⁺ —
Pedro Pagés

Pedro Pagés

C·STL
Compare
Compare
PA
165
H
31
HR
4
AVG
.205
xwOBA
.265
PPG
0.80
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
Proj2184.227.281.354.127.28625.2%6.3%18.9%20301.40—
202651165.205
2026 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

165 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.265
xBA
7
.213
.245
.325
.120
.265
26.1%
3.6%
22.5%
4
2
41
0.80
—
2025110389.230.274.363.133.26227.5%4.9%22.6%1111311.19—
202470219.236.282.374.138.28426.5%5.9%20.6%72801.14—
xSLG
10
.337
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
6
85.0
Median EV
53
92.8
90th % EV
47
104.8
Barrel %
21
5.4
Hard-Hit %
28
38.4
Sweet-Spot %
23
33.0
Bat Speed
Avg
43
70.1
Median
56
72.4
90th %
54
77.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
6
38.3
Whiff %
21
26.5
K %
19
26.1
BB %
2
3.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
107
≈ 76th pctl
Chase cost
-3.1r
35 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-0.7r
20 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
54.4%
171 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.23
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
122112254+67%655-36%11+0%9-11%9224+27%11-10%10-37%164411+67%65-10%10211221CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 171