Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Rafael Devers

Rafael Devers

1B·SFG
Compare
Compare
PA
601
H
143
HR
28
AVG
.272
xwOBA
.376
PPG
2.64
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202670299.230.290.409.179.29230.8%7.4%23.4%901091.56—
2025165732.251
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

Expected Results
xwOBA
88
.376
xBA
77
.268
xSLG
.372
.477
.226
.374
26.2%
15.3%
10.9%
35
1
428
2.59
—
2024143601.272.358.516.244.37624.5%11.1%13.4%2833772.64—
2023159657.270.352.499.229.38519.2%9.4%9.8%3354462.81—
2022153614.295.360.521.226.37518.6%8.1%10.5%2734522.95—
2021176664.279.355.538.259.39621.5%9.3%12.2%3855192.95—
202058248.263.310.483.220.32827.0%5.2%21.8%1101382.38—
2019161702.311.362.555.244.37117.0%6.8%10.2%3285553.45—
2018135490.240.299.433.193.31124.7%7.8%16.9%2172752.04—
201762240.284.338.482.198.30723.8%7.5%16.3%1031512.44—
88
.512
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
93
93.2
Median EV
94
96.6
90th % EV
91
108.8
Barrel %
83
13.0
Hard-Hit %
92
52.6
Sweet-Spot %
80
38.5
Bat Speed
Avg
60
70.8
Median
57
72.0
90th %
65
77.6
Plate Discipline
Chase %
31
30.3
Whiff %
14
28.3
K %
29
24.5
BB %
82
11.1
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
94
≈ 26th pctl
Chase cost
-53.9r
490 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-11.7r
233 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
50.9%
2,401 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.73
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
+22%9+25%8+17%12+0%9+0%15+0%6+48%21+33%33+16%45+12%42+25%32+0%20+0%12+57%23+41%37-19%58-15%71+2%59+55%33+5%20+58%12+29%21-20%46-4%45-13%45+30%33+7%14+33%6+38%13+39%23+11%18+63%16+38%13+0%73453+14%751CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000