Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Taylor Walls

Taylor Walls

SS·TBR
Compare
Compare
PA
349
H
61
HR
8
AVG
.201
xwOBA
.278
PPG
1.80
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202645170.203.309.273.070.23925.9%11.8%14.1%08601.33—
202593318.219
2023 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

349 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.278
xBA
0
.199
.285
.318
.099
.262
22.0%
8.2%
13.8%
4
13
149
1.60
—
202474253.183.284.247.064.25626.5%12.3%14.2%115730.99—
2023100349.201.305.333.132.27826.4%12.6%13.8%8231801.80—
2022142466.172.269.285.113.27625.8%11.2%14.6%8111701.20—
202149176.211.314.296.085.28727.8%13.1%14.7%14521.06—
xSLG
0
.303
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
7
86.1
Median EV
5
88.5
90th % EV
4
100.2
Barrel %
5
3.3
Hard-Hit %
8
28.8
Sweet-Spot %
14
32.5
Bat Speed
Avg
16
67.3
Median
16
69.3
90th %
9
73.0
Plate Discipline
Chase %
98
17.8
Whiff %
39
23.9
K %
15
26.4
BB %
87
12.6
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
119
≈ 97th pctl
Chase cost
-16.1r
164 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-10.9r
205 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
43.3%
1,468 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-1.84
lg avg -2.54
Count
View
12+11%95+0%8+0%71+29%14+6%17+7%43+2%40+22%27+6%18+0%9+29%21-26%43-25%56-23%62-5%59+39%36+0%11+4%23-19%59-32%59-22%58-15%48+47%17+8%12-8%13+10%20+4%26+7%30+23%13+40%102+0%6+0%8+17%6+0%742CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000