Flanker the ClankerFlanker
Rankings
Leaderboards
  • Projections
    In-house Bayesian model · career prior + aging × stuff/discipline signals
  • Plate Discipline
    Decision+ · chase / passive cost · K% · BB%
  • Command & Stuff
    Pitching+ · Stuff+ · Command+ · meatball rate
  • Pitcher Stuff Lab
    In-zone whiff · xwOBAcon · tunnel · deception · count predictability
  • Stuff Model (diag)
    From-scratch XGBoost training runs, feature importance, pitcher grades
  • Expected Points
    Luck-neutral fantasy points · xSLG / xwOBA · ΔPts
  • Hitter Frontier
    Power × discipline tradeoff · Pareto-frontier hitters
  • Pitcher Frontier
    Process × contact-suppression · pound the zone vs limit damage
  • Hitter Vulnerabilities
    Biggest pitch-trait strengths & weaknesses · vs league or vs own
  • AAA Hitters
    Triple-A bats · xwOBA · contact quality · discipline · frontier
StreamersSign inConnect league →
Taylor Walls

Taylor Walls

SS·TBR
Compare
Compare
PA
253
H
40
HR
1
AVG
.183
xwOBA
.256
PPG
0.99
Career Seasons
YrGPAAVGOBPSLGISOxwOBAK%BB%K-BB%HRSBPtsPPGxPPG
202647178.215.320.282.067.24624.7%11.8%12.9%010681.45—
202593318.219
2024 MLB Percentiles

Hitting Profile

253 PA — below qualified cutoff. Percentiles vs. qualified pool (faded).

Expected Results
xwOBA
0
.256
xBA
0
.182
.285
.318
.099
.262
22.0%
8.2%
13.8%
4
13
149
1.60
—
202474253.183.284.247.064.25626.5%12.3%14.2%115730.99—
2023100349.201.305.333.132.27826.4%12.6%13.8%8231801.80—
2022142466.172.269.285.113.27625.8%11.2%14.6%8111701.20—
202149176.211.314.296.085.28727.8%13.1%14.7%14521.06—
xSLG
0
.265
Quality of Contact
Avg EV
6
85.5
Median EV
2
87.7
90th % EV
2
99.9
Barrel %
6
3.2
Hard-Hit %
2
24.0
Sweet-Spot %
18
33.1
Bat Speed
Avg
6
65.4
Median
5
66.6
90th %
3
71.4
Plate Discipline
Chase %
96
20.3
Whiff %
44
23.0
K %
15
26.5
BB %
96
12.3
Swing Decisions

Plate Discipline · Decision+

Expected-run-value of every swing-or-take decision, against a league-average batter’s optimum. 100 = avg · 110 = 1 SD better.

Decision+
105
≈ 68th pctl
Chase cost
-16.6r
145 swings @ bad pitch
Passive cost
-7.7r
132 takes @ hittable pitch
Swing rate
44.9%
1,024 pitches seen
Runs per 100
-2.38
lg avg -2.53
Count
View
235+9%11+0%7+0%93+23%13+15%20+32%28+18%34+16%32+20%20+0%11+35%31-7%46-26%69-25%68+0%47+38%39+6%17+26%35-7%46-28%50-21%66-12%48+32%19+0%6+18%11+5%21+7%29+4%24+36%145+0%7+17%6+0%6+0%7+0%6212CATCHER'S VIEW
Judgment — swing% vs optimal
−35%−15%0+15%+35%
  • Red cells — swings more than an optimal batter would here (chasing).
  • Blue cells — swings less than optimal (too passive).
  • Number in cell: swing%-delta vs optimal. Top-right: pitches seen.
Total pitches shown: 1,000